Construction bonds are a critical component of the construction industry, offering financial protection and ensuring project completion. Whether you’re bidding on public projects, working with private owners, or managing subcontractors, understanding the various types of bonds and their roles can save your business from unexpected risks. This guide breaks down the essential details about bid bonds, payment bonds, and performance bonds—collectively referred to as “P&P bonds”—and provides insights into how they protect contractors, subcontractors, and project owners.

We’ll also explore the differences between surety bonds and insurance, highlight how bonds function under the Miller Act and state laws, and discuss practical steps contractors can take to manage bonding challenges. Whether you’re a new business owner or an experienced contractor, this guide will help you navigate the complexities of construction bonds with confidence.

Contents:
Types of Construction Bonds
Bid Bonds Defined
P&P Bonds Defined
Surety Bonds Defined
The Difference in Surety Bonds and Insurance
State Bonding Requirements
Bonding Challenges
FAQs About Bonding
Financial Problems Caused by Bonds
Solutions to Bonding Costs


Main Types of Construction Bonds

Construction bonds are financial guarantees provided by a surety company to ensure that a contractor will fulfill their obligations under a contract. These bonds protect project owners, subcontractors, and suppliers by ensuring that funds and work are properly managed. The three main types of are:

  1. Bid Bonds
  2. Payment Bonds
  3. Performance Bonds
  4. Surety Bonds

Bid Bonds Definition

As the name implies, a bid bond is submitted with a contractor’s bid on a project. It is used to guarantee that the contractor will enter into the contract, and provide P and P bonds (payment and performance bonds) if their bid is chosen. Typically set at 5% of the bid amount, the bond covers damages if the contractor fails to proceed.

  • How It Works:
    • If the selected contractor backs out, the project owner can turn to the next lowest bidder.
    • The surety company compensates the owner for the difference, up to the bond’s value.

Some surety companies commit to providing performance and payment bonds alongside the bid bond, while others evaluate the contractor’s financial health at a later stage.


Payment and Performance Bonds (P&P Bonds) Definition

payment and performance bond ensures that a contractor will fulfill their contractual obligations (performance bond) and pay all subcontractors and suppliers (payment bond). These bonds are typically required on public projects and by certain private project owners.

  • Payment Bonds: Protect subcontractors and suppliers if a general contractor fails to pay them.
    • Subcontractors must adhere to strict notice and suit deadlines to claim against the bond.
  • Performance Bonds: Ensure the contractor completes the project as agreed.
    • If the contractor defaults, the surety may complete the project or provide funds for its completion.
  • Payment and Performance bond: A single bond that combines both the payment and performance bonds’ obligations.

Surety Bond Definition

A surety bond is an agreement to be liable for a debt, default, or other. It’s a three-party agreement in which the surety guarantees the obligations of a second party (the principal) to a third party (the obligee). Surety bonds are more akin to a line of credit, with the surety conducting financial and operational due diligence similar to a lender.

Surety Bonds vs. Insurance: Key Differences

Because they have similar jobs it’s easy to confuse surety bonds with insurance, but they serve very different purposes:

Surety BondsInsurance
A three-party agreement involving the contractor (principal), project owner (obligee), and surety.A two-party agreement between the insured and the insurer.
The surety provides a financial guarantee for the contractor’s obligations.The insurer covers specific risks or losses for the insured.
The contractor must reimburse the surety for any claims paid.No reimbursement is required after a payout.

The Miller Act and State Bonding Requirements

Designed to protect businesses on construction projects, bonds are covered by the federal Miller Act, a statute that governs bonding on federal projects that exceed certain dollar amounts. The statute sets forth the requirements as to how an unpaid first or second-tier labor material supplier needs to file a claim and attempt to get paid.

This law is mirrored by state-level “Little Miller Acts,” which govern bonding requirements for state and municipal projects.

  • Miller Act Federal Threshold: Most federal projects require bonds if they exceed $150,000.
  • Little Miller Act State Thresholds: Vary by state, with some requiring bonds for projects as small as $5,000.

These statutes primarily protect first- and second-tier subcontractors and suppliers. Third-tier subcontractors must rely on direct agreements with their contractors for payment security.

Common Challenges with Construction Bonds

Construction bonds, while essential, do come with occasional challenges:

  • Third-Tier Subcontractors:
    • These subcontractors often lack the protection required under laws like the Miller Act. Work-arounds include joint check agreements or requiring letters of credit.
  • Bond Claims:
    • Claims on P&P bonds can arise from non-payment or project delays. Following strict notice and filing protocols is crucial to avoid losing claim rights.
  • Subcontractor Bonding:
    • Financially-stressed subcontractors may struggle to secure bonds. General contractors sometimes provide additional guarantees or use subcontractor default insurance to mitigate risks.

FAQ: Common Questions About Construction Bonds

  1. How do I qualify for a bond?
    • Maintain strong financials, a solid performance history, and clear communication with your surety.
  2. How much do construction bonds cost?
    • Costs vary but typically range from 1% to 3% of the contract value, depending on the contractor’s creditworthiness.
  3. Can you file a lien on public property?
    • No, but public lien statutes allow claims against funds allocated for the project.

Added Financial Issues from Being Bonding

Managing bonded projects often creates financial strain for contractors, especially when cash flow is disrupted by delayed payments or unexpected costs. There as several reasons for the strain:

  1. Upfront Costs for Bonds:
    • Contractors must pay the premiums for bonds, which generally range from 1% to 3% of the total contract value. These upfront costs can add up, especially for larger projects.
  2. Stringent Financial Requirements:
    • Surety companies evaluate contractors’ financial health, requiring them to maintain strong credit, cash reserves, and a history of successful project completions. Contractors may need to restructure finances, set aside additional funds, or limit spending to meet the surety’s requirements.
  3. Delayed Project Payments:
    • Many projects involve delayed payments from owners, leaving contractors responsible for covering materials, labor, and overhead while waiting for funds. These delays can lead to cash flow challenges, especially if multiple bonded projects are ongoing.
  4. Liability for Claims:
    • If claims are made on a bond (e.g., for non-payment or incomplete work), contractors are liable to reimburse the surety for any payouts. This obligation can result in unexpected financial burdens.
  5. Limitations on Other Financing:
    • Contractors may need to maintain low debt levels or avoid other financial commitments to secure bonds, reducing their ability to access traditional financing for immediate needs.
  6. Large Financial Commitments Before Work Begins:
    • Bonds often require contractors to commit significant resources upfront to secure the bond, such as financial guarantees or collateral. This can strain cash flow before any revenue from the project is realized.
  7. Costs of Compliance:
    • Bond agreements often include tight compliance requirements, such as meeting deadlines, avoiding contract disputes, and ensuring payment to all subcontractors and suppliers. Managing these can create administrative and financial pressure.

These factors, combined with the inherent risks of the construction industry, can make bonding both a necessary safeguard, but at the same time, a source of economic strain for contractors.

RELATED READING: Is Obtaining Working Capital While Bonded More Difficult?

Mitigating the Financial Strain Caused by Bonding

One way contractors manage these issues is by taking advantage of resources such as:

  • Advance Payment Requests: Requesting partial payments from project owners to cover upfront costs.
  • Joint Payment Agreements: Working with subcontractors and suppliers to share financial responsibilities.
  • Industry-Specific Support Services: Seeking to work with professionals who understand the nuance of construction bonding and develop industry-specific strategies.
  • Stop-Gap Help: Considering temporary cash-flow support, in the form of alternative financing, if bonding’s added costs cut into your ability to pay bills.

Understanding risks and planning for potential money crunches can help these contractors stay on top of their projects and bonded commitments.

Conclusion

Construction bonds are a vital tool for managing risk and ensuring project success. Whether you’re new to the industry or managing a growing business, understanding these bonds can save you time, money, and headaches.

If you have questions about how our factoring solutions can help mitigate financial strain of being bonded, give us a call and see how CapitalPlus can help you succeed.


Please note: the information in this article is not legal advice and should not take the place of talking to your attorney.


Curt Powell VP of Sales

About the Author:
Curt Powell — Executive Vice President
Joining the team in 2016, Curt serves as Executive VP at CapitalPlus Financial Services, a direct lender based in Knoxville, Tennessee focusing exclusively on the construction industry. During that time he has walked thousands of business owners through the financing options to find the best solution for their needs.

Curt is a member of The International Factoring Association, The Association of General Contractors, and the Construction Financial Management Association.

CapitalPlus was established in 1998 providing over $1 billion in factoring funds empowering thousands of construction companies all over the US.

Google 5 star Reviews logo
BBB A+ Rating logo
ChamberofCommerce.com 5 star rating
ABF Journal Most Innovative Company

Back to blog
Request a call from CapitalPlus to discuss your construction business's financial options.